Research Article | Volume 10, Supplement 1, March, 2022

Identification and characterization of acidosis on in vitro rumen fermentation with feeds based on grass, rice bran, concentrate, and tofu pulp

Darwin Tiya Humaira Ami Muliawati   

Open Access   

Published:  Apr 15, 2022

DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2022.10s108
Abstract

The present study evaluated and characterized various types of biomass fermented in the rumen culture. A series of batch experiments were conducted to assess any potential organic acid build-up in the rumen culture fermenting different substrates of biomass. Results showed that pH depression occurred within 2 h of incubation in the rumen culture fermenting rice bran and/or concentrate in which the pH dropped from the neutral level (pH 6.9 ± 0.15) to the acidic level (pH 5.6 ± 0.15). However, at the same period of incubation, the fermentation of grass and tofu pulp in the rumen culture did not have a dramatic drop of pH in which the pH was somewhat stable between 7.0 and 6.85. Organic acids, such as acetic acid and lactic acid, were accumulated in the digesters of rumen culture fermenting rice bran and/or concentrate, suggesting that the culture was acidified which led to ruminal acidosis.


Keyword:     Rumen Acidosis Fermentation Biomass


Citation:

Darwin, Humaira T, Muliawati A. Identification and characterization of acidosis on in vitro rumen fermentation with feeds based on grass, rice bran, concentrate, and tofu pulp. J App Biol Biotech. 2022;10(2):53-58 DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2022.10s108

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text
Reference

Ahmad AA, Yang C, Zhang J, Kalwar Q, Liang Z, Li C, et al. Effects of dietary energy levels on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity, and feed efficiency of Yaks (Bos grunniens). Front Microbiol 2020;11:625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00625

2. Li F, Li C, Chen Y, Liu J, Zhang C, Irving B, et al. Host genetics influence the rumen microbiota and heritable rumen microbial features associate with feed efficiency in cattle. Microbiome 2019;7:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0699-1

3. Jaramillo-López E, Itza-Ortiz MF, Peraza-Mercado G, Carrera- Chávez JM. Ruminal acidosis: Strategies for its control. Aust J Vet Sci 2017;49:139-48. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322017000300139

4. Wanapat M. Rumen manipulation to increase the efficient use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in the tropics. Asian-australas. J Anim Sci Asian Aust J Anim 2000;13:59-67.

5. Li F, Guan LL. Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e00061-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00061-17

6. Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS One 2014;9:e85423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085423

7. McCann JC, Luan S, Cardoso FC, Derakhshani H, Khafipour E, Loor JJ. Induction of subacute ruminal acidosis affects the ruminal microbiome and epithelium. Front Microbiol 2016;7:701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00701

8. Wallace RJ, Rooke JA, McKain N, Duthie CA, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, et al. The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle. BMC Genom 2015;16:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2032-0

9. Pan L, Huang KH, Middlebrook T, Zhang D, Bryden WL, Li X. Rumen degradability of barley, oats, sorghum, triticale, and wheat in situ and the effect of pelleting. Agriculture 2021;11:647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070647

10. Hernández J, Benedito JL, Abuelo A, Castillo C. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot: From aetiology to prevention. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:702572. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/702572

11. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho G, McBride BW. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: The physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J 2008;176:21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.016

12. González LA, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Schwartzkopf- Genswein KS, Ferret A. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;172:66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009

13. Millen DD, Pacheco RDL, da Silva Cabral L, Cursino LL, Watanabe DH, Rigueiro AL. Ruminal acidosis. Rumenology 2016;2016:127-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30533-2_5

14. Dehkordi AJ, Dehkordi ZK. Occurrence of metabolic alkalosis in rumen lactic acidosis: A review article. Comp Clin Path 2011;20:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-010-1129-8

15. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7115-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00739-09

16. Alarcon P, Hidalgo AI, Manosalva C, Cristi R, Teuber S, Hidalgo MA, et al. Metabolic disturbances in synovial fluid are involved in the onset of synovitis in heifers with acute ruminal acidosis. Sci Rep 2019;9:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42007-1

17. Darwin, Barnes A, Cord-Ruwisch R. In vitro rumen fermentation of soluble and non-soluble polymeric carbohydrates in relation to ruminal acidosis. Ann Microbiol 2018;68:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-017-1307-x

18. Darwin, Blignaut D. Alkaline treatment for preventing acidosis in the rumen culture fermenting carbohydrates: An experimental study in vitro. J Adv Vet Anim Res 2019;6:100-7. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2019.f319

19. Darwin, Cord-Ruwisch R. Thermodynamics of anaerobic digestion: Mechanism of suppression on biogas production during acidogenesis. INMATEH Agric Eng 2019;57:287-301.

20. Loneragan GH, Dargatz DA, Morley PS, Smith MA. Trends in mortality ratios among cattle in US feedlots. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:1122-7. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.219.1122

21. Darwin, Ilham M, Fazil A. Performance and kinetic study of the anaerobic co-digestion of cocoa husk and digested cow manure with high organic loading rate. INMATEH Agric Eng 2018;55:131-40.

22. Darwin, Purwanto S, Rinaldi R. Removal of organic pollutants from Tofu-processing wastewater through anaerobic treatment process with short hydraulic retention time. Environ Res Eng Manag 2019;75:34-42. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.75.1.21532

23. Baethgen WE, Alley MM. A manual colorimetric procedure for measuring ammonium nitrogen in soil and plant Kjeldahl digests. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 1989;20:961-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628909368129

24. Gontupil J, Darwin, Liu Z, Cheng JJ, Chen H. Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and corn stover for biogas production. In: Annual International Meeting Conference 2012. Dallas, Texas: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; 2012.

25. Darwin, Cheng JJ, Liu Z, Gontupil J. Anaerobic co-digestion of cocoa husk with digested swine manure: Evaluation of biodegradation efficiency in methane productivity. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 2016;8:147- 56.

26. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association; 2017.

27. Zenker W, Clauss M, Huber J, Altenbrunner-Martinek B, Fidgett A, Hatt JM, et al. Rumen pH and hoof health in two groups of captive wild ruminants. Zoo Anim Nutr 2009;4:247-54.

28. Nocek JE. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:1005-28. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76026-0

29. Darwin, Charles W, Cord-Ruwisch R. Anaerobic acidification of sugar-containing wastewater for biotechnological production of organic acids and ethanol. Environ Technol 2019;40:3276-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1468489

30. Darwin, Fazil A, Ilham M, Sarbaini, Purwanto S. Kinetics on anaerobic co-digestion of bagasse and digested cow manure with short hydraulic retention time. Res Agric Eng J 2017;63:121-7. https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2016-RAE

31. Calsamiglia S, Blanch M, Ferret A, Moya D. Is subacute ruminal acidosis a pH related problem? Causes and tools for its control. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;172:42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.007

32. Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR. Acidosis in cattle: A review. J Anim Sci 1998;76:275-86. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761275x

33. Krause KM, Oetzel GR. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;126:215-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.004

34. Choudhary S, Muralidhara A, Ravindranath BM. Ruminal acidosis in small ruminants and its therapeutic management. Intas Polivet 2011;12:320-1.

35. Muir LA, Rickes EL, Duquette PF, Smith GE. Prevention of induced lactic acidosis in cattle by thiopeptin. J Anim Sci 1981;52:635-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.523635x

36. Lorenz I, Gentile A. D-lactic acidosis in neonatal ruminants. Vet Clin Food Anim Pract 2014;30:317-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.03.004

Article Metrics
15 Views 20 Downloads 35 Total

Year

Month

Related Search

By author names

Similar Articles

Effect of Wild and Mutant Strain of Lasiodiplodia Pseudotheobromae Mass Produced on Rice Bran as a Potential Bioherbicide Agents for Weeds under Solid state Fermentation

Adetunji C. O.a, Oloke J.Kb

Medium Formulation and its optimization for increased protease production by Penicillium sp. LCJ228 and its potential in blood stain removal

V. Benluvankar, S. Evelyne Priya, J. Joel Gnanadoss

Production and Characterization of Collagenase by Penicillium sp. UCP 1286 Isolated From Caatinga Soil

Maria Carolina de Albuquerque Wanderley , Jose Manoel Wanderley Duarte Neto, Carolina de Albuquerque Lima, Sara Isabel da Cruz Silverio, Jose Luiz de Lima Filho, Jose Antonio Couto Teixeira, Ana Lucia Figueiredo Porto

Screening, Selection and Optimization of the Culture Conditions for Tannase Production by Endophytic Fungi Isolated from Caatinga

Rayza Morganna Farias Cavalcanti, Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Ornela, João Atílio Jorge, Luís Henrique Souza Guimarães

Proteome and fermentative parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1 under Very High Gravity Fermentation (VHGF) using sugarcane juice

Gabriela de Sá Azarias, Heloisy Suzes Barbosa, Cynthia Barbosa Rustiguel, José Cesar Rosa, José Roberto Ernandes, Luis Henrique Souza Guimarães

Production, characterization and optimization of fermented tomato and carrot juices by using Lysinibacillus sphaericus isolate

Naga Sivudu Seelam, Harika Akula, Umamahesh Katike, Vijaya Sarathi Reddy Obulam

Fermentative Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from Glycerol by Zobellella taiwanensis Azu-IN1

Mohamed Ali Abdel-Rahman, Said El-Sayed Desouky, Mohamed Salah Azab, Mahmoud E. Esmael

Biochemical and molecular characterization of a new pullulan producer Rhodosporidium paludigenum PUPY-06

RS Singh, Navpreet Kaur

Biocatalysis of agro-processing waste by marine Streptomyces fungicidicus strain RPBS-A4 for cellulase production

Rajanikanth Akurathi, Damodharam Thoti

Inulinase production in shake-flask fermentations from Mucor circinelloides BGPUP-9

Ram Sarup Singh, Kanika Chauhan, Randeep Kaur, Ramanpreet Kaur

Laccase production by Myrothecium gramineum and its optimization under solid state fermentation using cowpea pod as substrate

V. Daphne Vivienne Gnanasalomi, J. Joel Gnanadoss

Screening and identification of amylase producing strains of Bacillus

Kumar Pranay, Shree Ram Padmadeo, Vijay Jha, Birendra Prasad

Analysis of physicochemical and sensory parameters of wine produced from Carica papaya

Suhail Cholassery, Vidhu Krishna, SreethuVeliparambil Sethuraj,Shabnam Shajahan Rehina, Vandana Ranganathan, Lisha Chanassery Dileep, Kuzhunellil Raghavanpillai Sabu, Bhama Ramachandran Rajesh, Ramachandran Pratap Chandran

Enhanced biobutanol production by optimization of the medium from Clostridium acetobutylicum MTCC 11274 using macroalgae Gracilaria edulis

Shelly Rana, Kashyap Dubey, Ashwani Dhingra

Media optimization studies and production of adenosylcobalamin (Vitamin B12) by environment friendly organism Rhizobium spp

Neha Nohwar, Rahul V. Khandare, Neetin S. Desai

Amylase production by Aspergillus niger in submerged cultivation using cassava

Muralikandhan Kamaraj, Dhanasekaran Subramaniam

Production and purification of extracellular fungal cellulases using agricultural waste

Abishna Burugu, Dheerendra Kumar Suman, Chandrasekhar Chanda

Enhancement of Vitamin D2 content through ultraviolet-B irradiation in submerged cultivated Pleurotus eryngii mycelia using response surface methodology

Umesh Singh, Ashwani Gautam, Satyawati Sharma

Role of lacto-fermentation in reduction of antinutrients in plant-based foods

Mehak Manzoor, Deepti Singh, Gajender Kumar Aseri, Jagdip Singh Sohal, Shilpa Vij, Deepansh Sharma

Impact of diverse processing treatments on nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics of soybean (Glycine max L.)

Priyanka Thakur, Krishan Kumar, Naseer Ahmed, Ajar Nath Yadav, Sunil Kumar, Qurat Ul Eain Hyder Rizvi, Divya Chauhan, Sumaira Jan

Effect of diverse fermentation treatments on nutritional composition, bioactive components, and anti-nutritional factors of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

Sumaira Jan, Krishan Kumar, Ajar Nath Yadav, Naseer Ahmed, Priyanka Thakur, Divya Chauhan, Qurat-Ul-Eain Hyder Rizvi, Harcharan Singh Dhaliwal

Solid-state fermentation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) shell using Trichoderma sp., tape yeast, and tempeh yeast to produce cellulase

Muhammad Yusuf Abduh, Chalil Rizqullah Ramadhan, Alfanny Putri Fadhlilah, Siti Dhiffah Nabilah Abdul, Khairul Hadi Burhan

Impact of soaking, germination, fermentation, and roasting treatments on nutritional, anti-nutritional, and bioactive composition of black soybean (Glycine max L.)

Divya Chauhan, Krishan Kumar, Naseer Ahmed, Priyanka Thakur, Qurat Ul Eain Hyder Rizvi, Sumaira Jan, Ajar Nath Yadav

Extraction of a novel bacteriocin from Lacticaseibacillus casei VITCM05 and its antibacterial activity against major food-borne pathogens

Jannatul Firdous Siddique, Mohanasrinivasan Vaithilingam

Isolation, characterization and optimization of keratinolytic bacteria from chicken feather waste dumping site

Thiyagarajan Amuthavalli, Cyril Ravi

High cell density fermentation strategies for the production of bovine lactoferrin in Pichia pastoris

Thuy Thi Thu Trinh, Huong Thu Ngo, Phong Quoc Truong

Increasing polyphenol antioxidant in Orthosiphon stamineus Benth leaves with fermentation extraction by Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC-9763

Muhammad Aria Chandra, Khaswar Syamsu, Laksmi Ambarsari, Nurul Fatimah, Waras Nurcholis,

A novel fibrinolytic enzyme producer from mangrove soil sediments: Screening, isolation, strain improvement, and fermentation

Bhavana Sompalli, Alok Malaviya,,

Effects of process parameters on the alcoholic fermentation of pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) juice

Huynh Xuan Phong, Tran Thi Yen Nhi, Nguyen Ngoc Thanh, Le Dang Truong

Recent advances in the processing of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) as a potential bioenergy crop for bioethanol production

Priya Chamoli, Samiksha Jhildiyal, Palak Agrawal, Navin Kumar, Pallavi Singh

Optimizing solid-state fermentation for metabolite enrichment by Aspergillus tamarii on rice bran and wheat

Syaefudin Suminto,, Arthur Alba Huang, Uswatun Hasanah, Waras Nurcholis,

Statistical optimization of process variables for anti-hypercholesterolemic metabolites production from Monascus purpureus MTCC 369 fermented finger millet

Monu Kumar, Gaurav Chaudhary, Anita Rani Sehrawat, Anoop Singh, Guddu Kumar Gupta

Investigation of optimal parameters for aspartic protease production from Aspergillus terreus using solid-state fermentation

Sadeq Fenjan Hasnawi,, Alaa Jabbar Abd Al-Manhel, Zena Kadhim AL-Younis