Scale-down bioreactor strategies: A bibliometric and technical review of experimental and modelling approaches
Industrial bioreactors often present spatial and temporal inhomogeneities in key variables, such as dissolved oxygen, pH, and substrate concentration, leading to physiological stress and reduced performance in microbial and mammalian cell cultures in terms of biomass and metabolites of interest in the industrial microbial processes. This comprehensive bibliometric study examines how these environmental fluctuations have been replicated and studied in laboratory-scale systems using scale-down bioreactor designs and computational tools. Bibliometric analysis, based on data retrieved from the Scopus database, was employed to quantitatively evaluate publication trends, research productivity by country and institution, and regional disparities in scientific output. This work analyzes the evolution of scale-down approaches from 1997 to 2024, covering experimental configurations and computational modeling strategies. Two-compartment systems – particularly stirred-tank reactor (STR)– plug-flow reactor (PFR) and STR–STR – remain the most widely used to replicate mixing limitations and gradient formation, while three-compartment designs and alternative feeding strategies enable more complex perturbation studies. Corynebacterium glutamicum, Escherichia coli, Penicillium chrysogenum, and mammalian cells have been the most studied strains in scale-down configurations. Computational tools have advanced from mass-balance and stochastic residence-time models to high-resolution computational fluid dynamics simulations that capture turbulence, multiphase flows, and cell-level dynamics. The integration of these physical and digital approaches is strengthening process understanding, enabling predictive scale-up, and supporting the design of robust, efficient industrial bioprocesses. Emerging trends in machine learning integration and high-throughput microsystems are also discussed as future avenues for optimizing bioprocess robustness.
Olayo-Gordillo AS, Ramirez-Malule H, Gómez-Ríos D. Scale-down bioreactor strategies: A bibliometric and technical review of experimental and modelling approaches. J Appl Biol Biotech 2026. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2026.289589
1. Deveci M, Isik M, Mishra AR, Rani P, Gokasar I, Liu Z. Evaluation of bioeconomic practices within structural changes using picture fuzzy decision-making model. Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2025;75:369-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.08.017
2. Ziegler M, Zieringer J, Döring CL, Paul L, Schaal C, Takors R. Engineering of a robust Escherichia coli chassis and exploitation for large-scale production processes. Metab Eng. 2021;67:75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2021.05.011
3. Kuschel M, Takors R. Simulated oxygen and glucose gradients as a prerequisite for predicting industrial scale performance a priori. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117(9):2760-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27457
4. Rafiq QA, Hanga MP, Heathman TR, Coopman K, Nienow AW, Williams DJ, et al. Process development of human multipotent stromal cell microcarrier culture using an automated high-throughput microbioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(10):2253-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26359
5. Olughu W, Nienow A, Hewitt C, Rielly C. Scale-down studies for the scale-up of a recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum fed-batch fermentation: Loss of homogeneity leads to lower levels of cadaverine production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2020;95(3):675-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6248
6. Neubauer P, Junne S. Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(1):114-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.001
7. Moussa A. Scale up and Scale Down of Equipment. In: Systematic Process Development: From Idea to Value via Technology Readiness Levels. ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 1426. United States: American Chemical Society; 2022. p. 117-55. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022- 1426.ch007
8. Arulrajah P, Lievonen AE, Suba?? D, Pagal S, Weuster-Botz D, Heins AL. Scale-down bioreactors—comparative analysis of configurations. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2025;48:1619–1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-025-03182-w
9. De Mello AF, De Souza Vandenberghe LP, Herrmann LW, Letti LA, Burgos WJ, Scapini T, et al. Strategies and engineering aspects on the scale-up of bioreactors for different bioprocesses. Syst Microbiol Biomanuf. 2024;4(2):365-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-023- 00205-z
10. Cardona-Galeano W, Ramirez-Malule H, Gómez-Ríos D. Hybrids based on coumarins and their anticancer activities: A bibliometric analysis. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2023;13(9):204-12. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2023.150232
11. Cardona-Galeano W, Ramírez-Malule H, Gómez-Rios D. Anticancer activity of monastrol, hybrids and derivatives: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of recent research. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2024;14(2):73-82. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2024.152544
12. Galván ML, Agudelo VA, Ríos DG, Malule HR. A bibliometric landscape of polyhydroxyalkanoates production from low-cost substrates by Cupriavidus necator and its perspectives for the Latin American bioeconomy. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2024;12:48-61. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2024.159864
13. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
14. Cardona-Galeano W, Yepes AF, Ramírez-Malule H. Triazole-based click chemistry as strategic for novel therapeutics treatments of cancer: A bibliometric analysis 20072024. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2025. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2025.221899
15. López-Itas LD, Gómez-Ríos D, Ramírez-Malule H. Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Bibliometric Trends and Latin American Opportunities from a Chemical Engineering Perspective. Biomass. 2025 Dec 18;5(4):82. doi:10.3390/biomass5040082
16. Haby B, Hans S, Anane E, Sawatzki A, Krausch N, Neubauer P, et al. Integrated robotic mini bioreactor platform for automated, parallel microbial cultivation with online data handling and process control. SLAS Technol. 2019;24(6):569-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630319860775
17. Limberg MH, Schulte J, Aryani T, Mahr R, Baumgart M, Bott M, et al. Metabolic profile of 1,5-diaminopentane producing Corynebacterium glutamicum under scale-down conditions: Blueprint for robustness to bioreactor inhomogeneities. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(3):560- 75. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26184
18. Limberg MH, Pooth V, Wiechert W, Oldiges M. Plug flow versus stirred tank reactor flow characteristics in two-compartment scale-down bioreactor: Setup-specific influence on the metabolic phenotype and bioprocess performance of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Eng Life Sci. 2016;16(7):610-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201500142
19. Täuber S, Blöbaum L, Steier V, Oldiges M, Grünberger A. Microfluidic single-cell scale-down bioreactors: A proof-of-concept for the growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum at oscillating pH values. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119(11):3194-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28208
20. Cortés JT, Flores N, Bolívar F, Lara AR, Ramírez OT. Physiological effects of pH gradients on Escherichia coli during plasmid DNA production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(3):598-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25817
21. Bafna-Rührer J, Orth JV, Sudarsan S. Combined oxygen and glucose oscillations distinctly change the transcriptional and physiological state of Escherichia coli. Microb Biotechnol. 2024;17(11):e70051. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70051
22. Gaugler L, Hofmann S, Schlüter M, Takors R. Mimicking CHO large?scale effects in the single multicompartment bioreactor: A new approach to access scale?up behavior. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2024;121(4):1243-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28647
23. Paul K, Böttinger K, Mitic BM, Scherfler G, Posch C, Behrens D, et al. Development, characterization, and application of a 2?Compartment system to investigate the impact of pH inhomogeneities in large?scale CHO?based processes. Eng Life Sci. 2020;20(8):368-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000009
24. Chen Y, Haringa C, Wang Z, Zhuang Y, Wang G. Physiological response of Penicillium chrysogenum to mimicked local and global perturbations of substrate and dissolved oxygen gradients at industrial-scale. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2025;122(6):1402-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28968
25. Wang G, Zhao J, Haringa C, Tang W, Xia J, Chu J, et al. Comparative performance of different scale-down simulators of substrate gradients in Penicillium chrysogenum cultures: The need of a biological systems response analysis. Microb Biotechnol. 2018;11(3):486-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13046
26. Lemoine A, Maya Mart?nez-Iturralde N, Spann R, Neubauer P, Junne S. Response of Corynebacterium glutamicum exposed to oscillating cultivation conditions in a two- and a novel three-compartment scale-down bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(6):1220-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25543
27. Haringa C, Tang W, Deshmukh AT, Xia J, Reuss M, Heijnen JJ, et al. Euler-Lagrange computational fluid dynamics for (bio) reactor scale down: An analysis of organism lifelines. Eng Life Sci. 2016;16(7):652-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201600061
28. Mayer F, Cserjan-Puschmann M, Haslinger B, Shpylovyi A, Sam C, Soos M, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation improves the design and characterization of a plug-flow-type scale-down reactor for microbial cultivation processes. Biotechnol J.2023;18(1):e2200152. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202200152
29. Hajian CS, Haringa C, Noorman H, Takors R. Predicting by-product gradients of baker’s yeast production at industrial scale: A practical simulation approach. Processes. 2020;8(12):1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121554
30. Moser A, Appl C, Pörtner R, Baganz F, Hass VC. A new concept for the rapid development of digital twin core models for bioprocesses in various reactor designs. Fermentation. 2024;10(9):463. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090463
31. Anane E, García ÁC, Haby B, Hans S, Krausch N, Krewinkel M, et al. A model-based framework for parallel scale-down fed-batch cultivations in mini-bioreactors for accelerated phenotyping. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116(11):2906-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27116
32. Fink M, Cserjan-Puschmann M, Reinisch D, Striedner G. High-throughput microbioreactor provides a capable tool for early stage bioprocess development. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81633-6
33. Hashizume T, Ozawa Y, Ying BW. Employing active learning in the optimization of culture medium for mammalian cells. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2023;9(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-023-00284-7
34. Huang Y, Sheth RU, Zhao S, Cohen LA, Dabaghi K, Moody T, et al. High-throughput microbial culturomics using automation and machine learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(10):1424-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01674-2
35. Anane E, Sawatzki A, Neubauer P, Cruz-Bournazou MN. Modelling concentration gradients in fed-batch cultivations of E. coli towards the flexible design of scale-down experiments. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2019;94(2):516-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5798
36. Richter J, Wang Q, Lange F, Thiel P, Yilmaz N, Solle D, et al. Machine learning-powered optimization of a CHO cell cultivation process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2025;122(5):1153-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28943
37. Gómez-Rios D, Ramírez-Malule H. Towards bioprocessing 4.0: Scaling sustainable innovation in the pharmaceutical bioeconomy. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2025;15(12):1-3. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2025.v15.i12.1ED
38. Benner P, Meier L, Pfeffer A, Krüger K, Oropeza Vargas JE, Weuster-Botz D. Lab-scale photobioreactor systems: Principles, applications, and scalability. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2022;45(5):791-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02711-1
39. Schweder T, Krueger E, Xu B, Juergen B, Blomsten G, Enfors SO, et al. Monitoring of genes that respond to process-related stress in large-scale bioprocesses. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;65(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19991020)65:2<151:aid-bit4>3.0.co;2-v
40. Noorman H. An industrial perspective on bioreactor scale-down: What we can learn from combined large-scale bioprocess and model fluid studies. Biotechnol J.2011;6(8):934-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201000406
41. Hoang MD, Polte I, Frantzmann L, Von Den Eichen N, Heins AL, Weuster-Botz D. Impact of mixing insufficiencies on L-phenylalanine production with an Escherichia coli reporter strain in a novel two-compartment bioreactor. Microb Cell Fact. 2023;22(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02165-4
42. Käß F, Hariskos I, Michel A, Brandt HJ, Spann R, Junne S, et al. Assessment of robustness against dissolved oxygen/substrate oscillations for C. Glutamicum DM1933 in two-compartment bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014;37(6):1151-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-1086-0
43. Bareither R, Bargh N, Oakeshott R, Watts K, Pollard D. Automated disposable small scale reactor for high throughput bioprocess development: A proof of concept study. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110(12):3126-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24978
44. Lorantfy B, Jazini M, Herwig C. Investigation of the physiological response to oxygen limited process conditions of Pichia pastoris Mut+ strain using a two-compartment scale-down system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;116(3):371-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.03.021
45. Farrell P, Sun J, Gao M, Sun H, Pattara B, Zeiser A, et al. Development of a scaled-down aerobic fermentation model for scale-up in recombinant protein vaccine manufacturing. Vaccine. 2012;30(38):5695-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.031
46. Bower DM, Lee KS, Ram RJ, Prather KL. Fed-batch microbioreactor platform for scale down and analysis of a plasmid DNA production process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(8):1976-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24498
47. Ali S, Perez-Pardo MA, Aucamp JP, Craig A, Bracewell DG, Baganz F. Characterization and feasibility of a miniaturized stirred tank bioreactor to perform E. Coli high cell density fed-batch fermentations. Biotechnol Prog. 2012;28(1):66-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.708
48. Demling P, Ankenbauer A, Klein B, Noack S, Tiso T, Takors R, et al. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 endures temporary oxygen limitations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118(12):4735-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27938
49. Anane E, Knudsen IM, Wilson GC. Scale-down cultivation in mammalian cell bioreactors-the effect of bioreactor mixing time on the response of CHO cells to dissolved oxygen gradients. Biochem Eng J.2021;166:107870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107870
50. Yang Q, Lin W, Xu J, Guo N, Zhao J, Wang G, et al. Changes in oxygen availability during glucose-limited chemostat cultivations of Penicillium chrysogenum lead to rapid metabolite, flux and productivity responses. Metabolites. 2022;12(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010045
51. Lyubenova V, Junne S, Ignatova M, Neubauer P. Software sensor design considering oscillating conditions as present in industrial scale fed-batch cultivations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110(7):1945-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24870
52. Delvigne F, Destain J, Thonart P. Elaboration of a biased random walk model with a high spatial resolution for the simulation of the microorganisms exposure to gradient stress in scale-down reactors. Biochem Eng J.2008;39(1):105-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.019
53. Sarkizi Shams Hajian C, Haringa C, Noorman H, Takors R. Predicting by-product gradients of baker’s yeast production at industrial scale: A practical simulation approach. Processes. 2020;8(12):1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121554
Year
Month
High-density culture of Vero cells in novel perfusion bioreactor system
Ravindra Patel, Debjani Dasgupta, Madhavi VernekarRevisiting microbial pectinases: An understanding between structure-functional relationship in the arena of genetic engineering
Surojit Bera, Evangeline Rajan, Sandali Shakya, Imasha Perera, Sasini Wijewarna, Movinya SeminiSequential passage and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells derived from single and pooled human umbilical cord tissue
Chirayu Padhiar, Muthuraman Muthuchamy, Arvind Kumar Dhanraj, Srividhya Raghavan, Mayur Abhaya, Wilson Aruni